Skip to main content

Assessment of double-pass pin finned solar air heater at different air mass ratios via energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E) approaches

Research Authors
Saleh Abo-Elfadl, Mohamed S Yousef, Hamdy Hassan
Research Date
Research Year
2021
Research Journal
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Research Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Research Vol
28
Research Rank
11
Research_Pages
13776-13789
Research Website
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-020-11628-9
Research Abstract

In this study, an assessment based on energy, exergy, economic, and environmental approaches on a double-pass (DP) solar air heater (SAH) having pin finned absorber at different air mass ratios up and down the absorber is investigated experimentally. Four air mass ratios are considered: (i) all the air mass flow passes up the absorber and returns to pass down the absorber (DP), (ii) 2/3 of the airflow passes up the absorber and returns to mix with the remainder of air to pass down the absorber (2/3 DP), (iii) the same as (ii) but 1/3 of the air passes up the absorber (1/3 DP), and (iv) all the air mass passes only down the absorber (single pass, SP). For all mass ratios, the performance of pin finned SAH (P_SAH) is compared with that of flat SAH (F_SAH). The results indicated that the air temperature rise and energy and exergy efficiencies of P_SAH are highly greater than those of F_SAH. The highest average thermal efficiency of F_SAH is 56.7% obtained at DP flow condition, whereas the highest value of P_SAH is 65.21% obtained at 2/3 DP with an increase of 17.6% compared with F_SAH. Also, P_SAH has higher average exergy efficiency of about 34.7% compared to F_SAH. Furthermore, P_SAH achieves energy payback time (EPBT) lower than that of F_SAH, while P_SAH has higher embodied energy. The findings indicated that F_SAH at SP airflow pattern has the maximum energy cost (0.0427 $/kWh), whereas P_SAH at 2/3 DP airflow pattern achieves the minimum energy cost (0.037 $/kWh). Finally, the proposed P_SAH system appears to be more viable from exergoeconomic and enviroeconomic approaches compared to F_SAH.